DISARMAMENT, NOT LOW-YIELD NUKES
By Robert C. Koehler
1136 words
Seven-plus decades ago, as humanity was ensnarled in a monstrous world war, its instinct to win — to dominate others above all else — achieved ultimate manifestation: the capacity to annihilate all life on Planet Earth.
Nuclear weapons are, you might say, the logical outcome of the 10,000-year journey of civilization: “God blessed them and said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and every creature that crawls upon the earth.’”
And so we have. And now we’re stuck with ourselves, as are all other forms of life.
When the issue is nukes, and what to do with them, I think the first mistake we make is to put them into too narrow of a context, within which they seem “necessary” (because others have them) and “usable” (just in case, you know, a really evil country or terrorist organization starts threatening us) and there’s no larger sense of how to be alive and what survival actually means.
In the us-vs.-them consciousness of nationalism — the cage in which most U.S. political and opinion leaders are trapped — there could hardly be a concept more worthy of eyeball-rolling contempt than disarmament.
And once nuclear disarmament is deemed out of the question, or “unrealistic,” the nuclear playing field remains wide open. Thus, among other fragments of incendiary news from the Trump administration, there’s this: “The U.S. Department of Energy has started making a new, low-yield nuclear weapon designed to counter Russia,” as NPR reported a few days ago. The weapon, known as the W76-2, would also, I fear, free the generals and war planners from the straightjacket known as Mutually Assured Destruction, or MAD, that cruel paradox of national defense: that possession of humanity’s most powerful weapon doesn’t mean you can use it. Nukes have no purpose other than to prevent their use by others who possess them.
Mutually Assured Destruction, a.k.a. mutual vulnerability, has been the ruling principle of a nation-divided planet for the entirety of my lifetime. It’s a sophisticated advancement beyond mere conquest, which was the ruling principle of empire. MAD represents an acknowledgement, of sorts, that our instinct to conquer has a limit. We still want to dominate each other, and playing conventional war, especially against impoverished and indigenous peoples, and exploiting their resources, is still permissible, but the development of nuclear weapons is humanity’s apex. We can have them but we can’t use them.
It’s a way of sort of getting along, and it’s a cornerstone of political centrism. It’s also a brilliant way to marginalize the proponents of disarmament and keep the cash flowing endlessly to the military industrialists of the world. Even though nukes must never be used, we have to keep upgrading our stash.
Robert Dodge of Physicians for Social Responsibility, for instance, writes of “the new arms race initiated by the United States plan to spend over $1 trillion in the next three decades to rebuild our entire nuclear arsenal. This plan has been duplicated by every other nuclear nation, not wanting to fall behind in the mythological idea of ‘nuclear deterrence.’”
Defense Secretary Jim Mattis put it a little more politely: “America can afford survival.”
Mattis (maybe I finally get his nickname, MAD Dog) is quoted by Republican Sen. Jon Kyl and former CIA acting director Michael Morell in a recent Washington Post op-ed, in which they defend the development of low-yield nukes. In the process, they make this fascinating comment:
“As the government’s mind-set shifts from waging counterterrorism and counterinsurgency wars to a return of great power competition with Russia and China, nuclear weapons must continue to maintain their deterrent effect.”
So we’re done with the war on terror now? Does that mean we’ve bombed evil out of existence, or simply that it’s time to abandon our quagmires and move on — or rather, move back, to the good old days of the Cold War?
Russia, they write, “is intent on exploiting what it perceives as a U.S. nuclear capability gap on the lower levels of the escalatory ladder. That is because a high-yield, long-range U.S. response to Russia’s first, limited use of a low-yield nuclear weapon against a military target is not credible. The Russians believe we are not likely to risk a global thermonuclear war in response to a ‘tactical’ nuclear attack by them.”
We’re good, they’re evil, but damn, we need to beef up “the lower levels of the escalatory ladder” so that Russia knows we have the ability to smother them with usable nukes if they toss some at us.
This is how the Consensus talks and thinks and acts, ever on the hair-trigger, which happens to be lucrative in the extreme. Survival means a tough posture and endless military, including nuclear, investment. We’re ruled by our paranoia, by the worst of who we are: by our domination complex.
Two crucial matters play no part in this caged thinking.
One is the ultimate realism of nuclear weapons, as relayed to the world by survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings. I’ve quoted Setsuko Thurlow before. She was a 13-year old schoolgirl when Hiroshima was hit:
“They were naked or tattered, burned, blackened and swollen. Eyes were swollen shut and some had eyeballs hanging out of their sockets. . . . Strips of skin and flesh hung like ribbons from their bones. Often these ghostly figures would collapse in heaps never to rise again. With a few surviving classmates I joined the procession carefully stepping over the dead and dying.
“At the foot of the hill was an army training ground about the size of two football fields. Literally every bit of it was covered with injured and dying who were desperately begging, often in faint whispers, ‘Water, water, please give me water.’ But we had no containers to carry water. We went to a nearby stream to wash the blood and dirt from our bodies. Then we tore off parts of our clothes, soaked them with water and hurried back to hold them to the mouths of the dying who desperately sucked the moisture. . . .”
The second is the fact that, in 2017, most of the world — 122 nations — passed a resolution in the United Nations calling for the elimination of nuclear weapons: “. . .each State Party that owns, possesses or controls nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices shall immediately remove them from operational status and destroy them, as soon as possible.”
For some reason, the debate on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons treaty was boycotted by all nine nuclear-armed nations, along with the armed West’s NATO allies. The vote was, of course, instantly forgotten so that disarmament, as a concept, need never be a part of the official discussion of how to achieve deterrence.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~end~~~~~~~~~~
Robert Koehler, syndicated by PeaceVoice, is a Chicago award-winning journalist and editor. His book, Courage Grows Strong at the Wound is available. Contact him at koehlercw@gmail.com or visit his website at commonwonders.com.
==================
Dear friend,
I am running to be Mayor of our Capitol City! Forty-two years ago, I arrived here alone with under $100 in my pocket. Now, I feel like the richest man in the world--because of you, my friends.
We have been together, side by side for so many battles, making life better for the people of Utah. Over the last six years of my public service, I left nothing on the table. I was all-in. It was a great honor to represent your opinions and values in the Senate. Knowing you were there inspired me and motivated me every single day. I can never express my thanks enough for your support over the years!
But our work together is not done. I am running for mayor of Salt Lake City so I can continue to be your voice in Utah. Will you join with me once again?
Thanks again for your support and kindness over the years. It is a gift I will treasure forever. I couldn’t be more excited to embark on this new journey with you.
Your friend, Jim
======================
Don't miss these free expert webinars!
Interested, but can't make the live webinar time? Register and we'll email you the replay link after the webinar airs.
The Exercise Rx for ADHD: How Movement Improves Attention, Working Memory, and Executive Functions
Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 2pm ET
with ADHD expert John J. Ratey, M.D.
Powerful evidence shows that exercise helps children and adults manage their ADHD. Movement turns on the brain’s attention networks and eases other symptoms, such as hyperactivity. Physical activity also has a positive effect on behavior and motivation, resulting in better school performance and better self-esteem.
The sponsor of this webinar is...
Play Attention: Exercise for the mind! Play Attention is the most comprehensive neurocognitive training program available designed to strengthen Executive Function and Self-Regulation. But technology by itself is not enough. The mind also grows with exercise, coaching/counseling, good nutrition, mindfulness, behavior shaping, and parent training. These are all components of the Play Attention system. Call 800-788-6786 and learn how we can customize Play Attention for you. | www.playattention.com | Request a Free Professional Consultation
Mention code #AdditudeMag0219 and receive $200 off your purchase + our Mindfulness App for FREE
How to Find Your Path: A Roadmap for Choosing a College, a Career, or Something Different
Tuesday, February 12, 2019 at 1pm ET
with ADHD expert Rick Fiery, M.S., MBA
The leap to college is often overwhelming for teens with ADHD, but this isn’t the only option after high school. Career success may well follow a different path, so learn about all the post-graduate options that can leverage your student’s strengths. If and when college is right, multiply the likelihood of success by helping your teen truly understand "why" he or she is going.
The ADHD-Depression Connection in Adults: Understanding the Link, Distinct Symptoms, and First-Line Treatments
Tuesday, February 26, 2019 at 1pm ET
with ADHD expert Roberto Olivardia, Ph.D.
Every adult with ADHD should take note of these statistics: Thirty percent of individuals with ADHD have had a depressive episode, and if you have ADHD, your risk of developing depression is four times greater than it is for those without the disorder. The good news is that more treatment options exist today for managing depression, ranging from psychotherapy to pharmacological interventions.
Want more free webinars?
Click here to find and listen to all of ADDitude's free on-demand webinars.
Subscribe to our FREE ADHD Experts Podcast — and leave a review!
